|
Site Links
Keyword Search
August 2008 Survey
What would you do? |
Costs, Benefits, and KidsPublished: January 3, 2005by: Susan Phillips
Throughout the daylong event in Washington, DC, participants kept returning to a few key elements: research has consistently shown a high return (both public and private) on every dollar invested in quality preschool for disadvantaged children; the U.S. labor force is aging and educational gains among younger workers have stalled; and emerging economies are threatening the ability of U.S. companies to remain competitive. "Each year China graduates twice as many students with bachelors' degrees as the U.S., and six times as many with engineering degrees. India is producing a million more college graduates each year," said Al Stroucken, chairman of the Minnesota School Readiness Business Advisory Council and CEO of H.B. Fuller Co. "Tomorrow's employees will need a significantly higher level of education, and they will need to be successful in many different jobs over their lifetimes." An Ambitious Agenda
Charles M. Kolb, the president of the Committee for Economic Development, said business leaders bring three key characteristics to the effort: they are comfortable with change, they are consumers of the end result of the educational process (the labor force); and they can be impatient. "That's good, because we don't have a lot of time," said Kolb. The Research
The studies show that while early gains in measures of cognitive ability, such as IQ scores, tended to diminish over time, children who participated in the programs had much better than expected outcomes in other, arguably more important, areas. On average, compared to peers of similar circumstances who did not attend these intensive programs, graduates were less likely to be held back in school, and to require special education services. They were: more likely to graduate from high school; less likely to be arrested; more likely to have gone on to higher education; more likely to be employed and to own their own homes; less likely to become parents while still teenagers; more likely to marry. One benefit/cost analysis that looked at Perry Preschool graduates at age 28 showed that the average benefit to participants was over $19,000 (mostly in the form of higher earnings) and the public benefit (higher tax receipts, reduced educational and criminal justice expenses, etc.) was over $88,000 per participant. Compared to the $12,356 cost per child of the program itself (all figures are in 1992 dollars), that's a pretty good return. More recent research, such as a Georgetown University study of universal preschool in Tulsa, Oklahoma, has bolstered the argument that preschool pays off as an investment in human capital. Big Question Marks For one thing, disagreements remain about the ultimate goal. Many attendees argued that universal preschool for 4- and 5-year-olds would have enormous economic benefits, and enjoy considerable public support. Others said that there is no compelling economic argument for publicly-funded preschool for children whose parents can afford to pay for it. Still others pointed out that a broader look at existing research would suggest that public investment in the birth-to-age-three category would yield the best results of all. Then there's the problem of defining quality, and bringing quality programs to scale. The research seems clear that small, intensive programs carried out by well-educated, well-paid, and well-supported teachers have powerful effects. But it is also clear that many existing preschool programs don't have those characteristics. "I could improve the outcomes for Head Start children right now," said Edward Zigler, director of the Center in Child Development and Social Policy at Yale University and one of the key figures behind the creation of Head Start 40 years ago. "I'd just require that Head Start teachers have bachelor's degrees. But that costs money." Some conferees pointed out that public support will vary depending on how programs are presented. "Are we talking about all-day day care, or targeted interventions for disadvantaged kids?" asked an Ohio legislator during one session. Mara Aspinall, president of Genzyme Genetics, said public opinion research in Massachusetts found insufficient support for public programs for children younger than three, so early education advocates are focusing their efforts on preschoolers. Tough Talk "Family environments are deteriorating," said James J. Heckman of Chicago University, a 2000 Nobel Laureate in economics. "Relatively more children are being raised in disadvantaged environments." (In a paper included in the conference materials, Heckman wrote that "A constellation of pathologies is associated with less educated mothers and teenage mothers. They are less likely to marry when they have children and they are more likely to divorce. Their IQs are low; family incomes are low, and the emotional and intellectual support accorded children is low.") One participant later told Heckman that while he welcomed the economists' powerful data-driven arguments in favor of preschool, he wanted to "make a plea for more sensitive use of language. If you want buy-in on this you need to be careful." A Preschool Freight Train? The push for preschool has to be "a movement. It has to be long term, and it has to transcend the election cycle of members of Congress," said LaRocca. "It has to be a freight train." He recommended that supporters find a marquee name that Congress will take seriously to head up their efforts. "They'll listen to Alan Greenspan," commented LaRocca. Betty Sternberg, Connecticut's education commissioner, said that when she approaches state lawmakers to argue for preschool funding, she keeps three notions in mind: "I remember that the lawmakers to whom I speak are parents, are grandparents. I do try to put in the hook, to make it personal," said Sternberg. She also has data about the achievement gap between rich and poor, white and minority students at her fingertips, and makes it clear how that gap begins before children enter school. Finally, she said, "The economic argument is one that you can make, but it's dependent on your audience. Some lawmakers will listen to that, some will listen to the personal, and some will listen to both and say, 'This really makes a lot of sense.'"
|
Related Topics
Topics:
Click a link above to view all content that has been categorized under that term.
Latest Action Alerts from the Youth Policy Action Center
|