To decrease isolation among single parents, one objective should be to take a close look at the
advice and lack of support from government.
In the 1980s, for example, numerous social agencies tried to reduce the likelihood that a
single-parent household would include other adults, particularly unmarried partners. In the mid-1980s,
federal officials even discussed reducing the level of allotments for households in which grandparents
joined the single-parent family.
This is shockingly myopic thinking. Findings from Stanford studies indicate that the presence of any
other adult in the household brings adolescent control levels closer to those found in two-parent families.
This suggests that there are functional equivalents of two-parent families -- that non-traditional grouping can
do the job of parenting, and that the raising of adolescents is not a task that can easily be borne by a lone
parent. Single mothers who choose television's Kate and Allie model, in which two single parents join forces
and share the burden, report that housing costs decrease (and the comfort and size of the house usually
increases), baby-sitting headaches lessen, and emotional support increases.
Government should be encouraging such extended families rather than viewing them as deviant. A
few private organizations, such as Roommates for Today's Family, in Southern California, match single
parents.
Schools could offer formal or informal help to single parents under financial duress (such stress can
affect a child's grades as much as or more than a learning disability) by helping them find support networks or
supportive living situations.
Extended support networks could also be offered by churches, government, private organizations,
and employers. These could come in a variety of forms. For example, a program called Project
Self-Sufficiency, sponsored by the City of Huntington Beach, California, has offered a self-esteem workshop
to help single parents and other, low-income parents, make the transition from public assistance to
employment and economic self-sufficiency. The basic theory of this program, which grew out of a drug and
alcohol-abuse prevention agency, is that the best way to prevent child abuse and substance abuse is to
promote a positive self-image among single parents and their children.
Some single parents have already established more informal models for the rest of us.
The director of one preschool described an imaginative single mom who, through her contacts at the
school, has started bartering with other parents. "She's learned how to network through her business
experience. She used to be a hairdresser, so she might do Delane's hair. And Delane makes beautiful
birthday cakes, which is what she barters. Or they trade baby-sitting time." Such trading of skills and time can
go a long way toward easing the burden. "This parent has created her own extended family. We have offered
group sessions to try to discuss bartering, to assess individual needs and what could be traded."
One woman in Los Angeles, a veteran of the women's movement and a single mother for 18 years,
suggested that new parent networks are a logical extension of feminism and the self-help movement that
followed the women's movement -- all those twelve-step programs for compulsive drinking, gambling,
overeating.
"You find the same emphasis on the group, the consciousness-raising group -- leaderless,
non-hierarchical, structured so that everybody has time to participate. These groups are basically
non-judgmental, though there are a set of norms and values attached," she said. "People make fun of the
self-help movement, but you don't solve problems by making fun of people. One woman in the group I
attend (for overeaters) also belongs to Alanon, a self-help group for families of addicts; she joined because
her child is a cocaine addict. She needed this group of other parents, who were facing the same problem
with their children, because her family of origin just didn't know how to cope; if anything, their advice made
the problem worse. The parent network movement may, however, harken to the feminist movement more in
this sense: the personal will eventually become political."
She continued, "I'm a child of my times -- I'm connected with both these movements. In the 1960s, I
connected with other single parents through an alternative public school that we helped start. We could just
as easily have linked through church or synagogue, but we didn't go. Rather, we did politics together and
what survived the politics was friendship and connection. We were all single parents. We formed an informal
extended family. With the exception of Dr. Spock, I've never read a how-to-parent book in my life; I have my
friends. It's revealing, I think, that most of us who made these kinds of connections can truthfully say today
that our kids are OK. The parents who didn't make those connections tend to be the ones with kids with
severe problems. Those of us who connected with each other shared resources; it's the people without
human resources who are so terribly lost, in part because human resources often lead to other
resources.
"The group was non-hierarchical, but I did consider some of the people in my group to be expert
parents, because I saw them parenting. However, you don't turn to the same parent every time. Some
parents are good at some kinds of advice; others are good at other kinds of advice. I was an expert on
schools, so other mothers turned to me for advice on that. And I knew about how to collect child-support
payments. Word spread. Other parents were experts on finding a baby-sitter or pediatricians. This was not a
group that met formally. It was simply a group of women, and some men, too, who talked frequently on the
telephone. I didn't know 'networking' was a word 18 years ago. In a sense, networking is a spurious term. It
simply means connecting with people."
As she spoke on the phone, her call-waiting line beeped. The caller was a single parent she had met
17 years ago, a member of the informal parenting group.
"You see, this doesn't end," she said, when she returned. "Our children are in their twenties and we
still turn to each other for parenting advice."
From "Childhood's Future" (Anchor) by Richard Louv. Richard Louv is Senior Editor of Connect for Kids and columnist for The San Diego Union-Tribune. He is also author of "101 Things You Can Do for Our Children's Future" (Anchor) and "The Web of Life" (Conari).