|
Site Links
Keyword Search
August 2008 Survey
What would you do? |
One Good Reason to VotePublished: October 20, 2002by: Cecilia Garcia and Jan Richter
Does it matter, really? Consider just one low profile, no-glamour program that is up for reauthorization in the next Congress: the Child and Adult Care Food Program, or CACFP. Kids at family child care centers probably aren’t talking about who’ll be elected to Congress as they drink their orange juice and eat their apple spice muffins. But that healthy snack is made possible by CACFP, and the members of Congress elected on November 5 will help determine how the program (and other child nutrition programs) continues. How much money will be made available to help child care providers offer healthy snacks, and what rules will the providers need to follow to access the money, and the nutrition advice that comes with it?
Healthy food, good advice Annual expenditures have grown from $1.3 million in 1969 to $1.7 billion in 2001. Licensed public and nonprofit child care centers, family and group child care homes for preschool children, after school programs for school age children, and adult day care centers that serve chronically impaired adults or people over the age of 60 are eligible to receive federal funds for meals and snacks. CACFP has always had two major components for children—a child care food program and a summer food service program. More recently, the Older American Act of 1987 authorized the participation of eligible adult day care centers. During the mid-1990s, pilot programs in seven states were authorized to provide dinner meals to children through the age of 18 in after school programs serving neighborhoods with high levels of child poverty. Since 1996, when new regulations were added to the program as part of the welfare reform legislation, the number of family day care homes using CACFP has dropped by 14 percent, after years of steady growth. Geraldine Henchy, senior policy analyst for the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC), says the changes, which include a complicated means test, discourage participation. “They cut the amounts of money by more than half that family care providers get, making the program harder to get on and less valuable for providers to bother with.”
It’s not that the need is gone, says Henchy. “Participation in CACFP helps improve the quality of child care because it comes with three site visits, training and education in nutrition and support for family care providers.” Congress could choose to make the regulations less burdensome for small family day care providers, as part of the 2003 reauthorization.
Gearline Duplessis of California opened her family child care program in 1990. “I am a nutrition resource to [the] parents of the children in my care because of the partnership I have with the Child Care Food Program,” says Duplessis. “The knowledge of the nutritionists, the support and the monthly information that I receive and pass on to the families I serve, has proven an asset to my program.”
Bobby Morton of Nebraska agrees. “It’s a blessing to us. I wouldn’t be able to operate on the budget I have for food,” she says. “I serve many families who are low income who would not be able to afford to pay me. There’s no way we could feed the kids without this program. I couldn’t charge the parents what it costs.” Crystal Moore of Nebraska has been a child care provider for more than 12 years. “The children I care for are almost all under the age of five years and I’m proud to say that I am able to offer them a wider range of choices because of this program” says Moore. “ All of us, my family included, have learned a great deal about proper eating habits and how this affects our future.” In addition to serving young children, the program helps some communities provide food and activities for older youth. Seven states currently have pilot after school programs that serve youth through their high school years. These pilot programs can provide dinner for teens in low-income areas. A key issue for Congress to consider next year is the extent to which this pilot program will be expanded. Reauthorization Issues
The next Congress will play a major role in seeing whether this program continues to successfully improve the nutrition of poor children or not. Child advocates are recommending that the reauthorization process increase the reach of this program so that more children and families will benefit. This can be achieved, according to Henchy and others, by reducing the paperwork, certification and reporting barriers that now exist; and by increasing meal reimbursement rates to provide a better incentive for child care providers to participate. Advocates also call for expanding the pilot programs for teens beyond the original seven states, and would like to see more poor neighborhoods become eligible as well. In addition to seeing that there is food on the table for child care and out-of-school programs, a strong CACFP is one way to see that child care providers have the tools and resources needed to make sure that young children learn good eating habits at an early age. “Kids learn their nutrition habits early,” says Henchy. “If the government wants to step up on the critical issue of obesity, it needs to intervene early.” The toddlers sharing a good snack or teenagers getting supper at their local Boys and Girls Club may have no idea of who is paying the food bills. But adults, especially voting adults, should know that a lot of hard work goes into making sure that good programs get sustained federal funding and support to keep kids well fed. Taking the time to find out where the candidates stand, and to cast your vote is one thing you can do to ensure that the people in Congress are committed to doing the hard work to protect and improve programs for kids.
Cecilia Garcia directs Connect for Kids . Jan Richter is Connect for Kids' senior policy and outreach analyst.
|
Related Topics
Topics:
Click a link above to view all content that has been categorized under that term.
Latest Action Alerts from the Youth Policy Action Center
|