|
Site Links
Keyword Search
|
Context on New Census Poverty & Income DataCompiled by Coalition for Human Needs, Connect For Kids, Voices For America’s Children Contacts: · Robyn Stein, Pro-Media, 212-245-0510, rlstein@promediacomm.com · Jan Richter, Connect For Kids, 240-418-3500 or 540-948-3272, jan@connectforkids.org · Deborah Weinstein, Coalition on Human Needs, 202-223-2532 x 31, dweinstein@chn.org · Monica Zimmer, Voices for America’s Children, 202/289-0777, ext. 221; zimmer@voicesforamericaschildren.org On August 26, 2004 the U.S. Bureau of the Census released the newest income and poverty data. There will be national data from 2003 and state and local figures from 2002-2003. For a better understanding of what the numbers mean, it’s useful to take a look at information already available about how families with children are faring. Here are facts about jobs and earnings, about hardships in making ends meet, and about shrinking government assistance for low-income families. The facts cited cover the same period as the forthcoming Census data or as close to it as possible. Individual facts from around the country were included where possible. Fewer Jobs and Shrinking Wages Plague Working Families Average wages (adjusted for inflation) are at their lowest point since May 2002. They have been in decline since July of 2003. Middle and low income workers have seen their wages stagnate or lose ground. The wages of the lowest income workers (in the bottom 10 percent) declined 0.7 percent in 2003 compared to the previous year. (Sources: Economic Snapshot: Jobs Up, Wages Down, Economic Policy Institute, June 28, 2004; available online at http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_snapshots_06282004; Weak Recovery Claims New Victim: Workers’ Wages, Bernstein and Mishel, Economic Policy Institute, EPI Issue Brief #196, February 5, 2004; available online at http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/issuebriefs_ib196. ) The federal minimum wage has been stuck at $5.15 an hour for seven years. Taking inflation into account, the minimum wage has lost more than a quarter of its value (26 percent) since 1979. According to the Economic Policy Institute, more than 1 million married couples with children and 623,000 single mothers with children would benefit from an increase to $7.00 an hour by April 2006. (Source: Minimum Wage Facts at a Glance, Economic Policy Institute; available online at http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/issueguides_minwage_minwagefacts) Job Losses Hit Single Mothers Hard It Takes an Income Well Over the Poverty Line to Make Ends Meet What is the Definition of Poverty? Working Families Face Deepening Hardship Food Insecure Households Grew in 2002 · Nationally, 11.1 percent of households were food insecure (12.1 million households – 34.9 million people); up from 10.7 percent in 2001. Black and Hispanic households were at twice the national average. Among those experiencing the worst hardships, children were hungry in 265,000 households at some point during 2002. (Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Household Food Security in the United States, 2002; available online at http://ers.usda.gov/publications/fanrr35/) · Medical researchers have found that toddlers in food insecure households are 30 percent more likely to have a history of hospitalization and 90 percent more likely to be reported in fair or poor health compared with toddlers in households without food problems. Low-income infants and toddlers whose families receive nutrition help (food stamps and WIC), cash assistance, and/or help paying energy bills are less likely to suffer food hardships, and less likely to be underweight or in poor health than low-income children without such help. (Source: Children’s Sentinel Nutrition Assessment Program (C-SNAP), The Safety Net in Action, July 2004, available online at https://dcc2.bumc.bu.edu/csnappublic/CSNAP2004.pdf.) · In 2000 the USDA ranked New Mexico first in the nation for food insecurity and hunger. · One out of three District of Columbia children is at risk of hunger; one out of four in suburban Maryland and one out of five in the Washington Metropolitan area. · The Capital Area Food Bank (District of Columbia) distributes over 20 million pounds of food, providing over 1.5 million meals a month that serve over 275,000 people annually. · The North Texas Food Bank (Dallas, Texas) reported that despite the reported economic turnaround, 55,000 North Texas families rely each month on food pantries to supplement their monthly food needs. This reflects a 20,000 (57 percent) increase in the number of families served through pantry programs prior to the 9/11 tragedy. In addition, 540,000 meals/snacks are served through on-site feeding programs. · The number of people being served each month at the St. Joseph, Missouri Food Bank has grown from 14,000 to 20,000 over the past 2 – 3 years. · Last year, City Harvest, the United State’s oldest and New York City’s largest food rescue organization, provided 18 million pounds for some of New York’s 1.5 million hungry women, men and children. Millions Lack Health Coverage · Texas ranks last, 50th out of 50 states, in the number of uninsured children (one-third of the low-income children in Texas are uninsured). (Source: Information gathered from Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, The Texas Children’s Defense Fund, and the Center for Public Policy Priorities). · New Mexico has the second highest number of uninsured children in the country. · Thirty-nine percent of low-income children (100 percent of FPL) in Colorado do not have health insurance, compared to 24 percent nationally. Poor Children are at Risk for Poor Health More Families Struggle to Meet Child Care Costs · Child care costs for a four-year-old in a child care center in Texas averages $4,160 per year – more than the cost of public college tuition in the state. (Source: Information gathered from Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, The Texas Children’s Defense Fund, and the Center for Public Policy Priorities). More Families Struggled with Finding Safe Affordable Housing · Families needed at least $15.21 an hour in 2003 to afford a 2-bedroom apartment, using the official definition of affordable (paying no more than 30 percent of income on rent). (Source: Out of Reach 2003, National Low Income Housing Coalition; available online at http://www.nlihc.org/oor2003/) · Rental housing costs continued to outstrip family budgets in many areas of the country. In 48 states and the District of Columbia the combined earnings from two full-time minimum wage workers is not enough to afford fair market rent. The metro areas with the largest increases between 2002 and 2003 in wages needed to afford housing were:
(Source: Out of Reach 2003: America’s Housing Wage Climbs, annual report by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, available online at http://www.nlihc.org/oor2003/table6.htm) · More than 3.6 million children live in low-income families either paying more than one-half their income on rent or living in severely substandard housing. Families with children make up 40 percent of the homeless population. (Source: Children’s Defense Fund; available online at http://www.childrensdefense.org/familyincome/housing). · Households with incomes below 150 percent of the federal poverty line spent 14 percent of their income on home energy in 2003. (Source: Current Population Survey, U.S. Census Bureau, 2003.) · According to the US Conference of Mayors report from December 2003, there was a 13 percent increase in requests for emergency shelter in 25 cities surveyed. In Los Angeles, California the increase was 15 percent; in the city of Santa Monica, California shelter requests rose by 25 percent. (Source: Hunger and Homelessness Survey, U.S. Conference of Mayors, December 2003; available online at http://www.usmayors.org/uscm/news/press_releases/documents/hunger_121803.asp). Struggling Working Families Need Help Because Wages are Too Low to Make Ends Meet; But Fewer Are Getting Public Help · Only 10-15 percent of eligible children receive public child care help. (Source: Children’s Defense Fund; http://www.childrensdefense.org) · Only one-quarter of eligible families receive any form of federal housing subsidy. (Source: National Low Income Housing Coalition; http://www.nlihc.org) · As of June 2003, 32 states made cuts to child care programs. (Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org/6-3-03tanf.pdf.) · All 500,000 children enrolled in Texas CHIP lost all dental, vision, and hospice services. (Source: Information gathered from Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured ,the Texas Children’s Defense Fund, and the Center for Public Policy Priorities). · As a result of recent state policy decisions, an estimated 6,000 Arizona children are at risk of losing public health insurance. (Source: Children’s Action Alliance, Arizona. http://www.azchildren.org) · Another 6,000 children in Arizona have been frozen out of the subsidy they need to have safe, reliable child care while their parents work. (Source: Children’s Action Alliance, Arizona. http://www.azchildren.org) · Based on income, 1,236,800 children under age 13 are potentially eligible for child- or after-school care in Texas, yet only 107,000 (8 percent) will actually receive a subsidy in 2002. (Source: Information gathered from Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, The Texas Children’s Defense Fund, and the Center for Public Policy Priorities). · In 2002, fewer than half of families with children poor enough to qualify for cash assistance got help from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, down from 52 percent just one year before, and steeply down from about 80 percent in the mid-1990s. The TANF caseload continued to decline in 2003 (by 3 percent of all recipients compared to the end of 2002). If poverty rises or stays the same during the same period, it will mean still fewer needy families will get the help TANF is designed to provide. (Sources: Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Change in Numbers of TANF Families and Recipients, 12/2002 – 12/2003; available online at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/TANF_data.htm Employment Rates for Single Mothers Fell Substantially During Recent Period of Labor Market Weakness, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, June 22, 2004; available online at http://www.cbpp.org/6-22-04ui.pdf) Poverty in 2002 Poverty Rose Again · 34.6 million poor people, rising to 12.1 percent of all Americans in 2002 (11.7 percent in 2001; 11.3 percent in 2000). · 12.1 million poor children, rising to16.7 percent of all children in America in 2002 (16.3 percent in 2001; 16.2 percent in 2000). Poverty was Deep 47 Million Low-Income People Other Nations Have Far Less Poverty In February 2001, a Syracuse University analysis of Luxembourg Income Study data concluded that California and New York had the highest child poverty rates not only in the nation, but among the developed nations of the world. The study adjusted for a number of factors commonly excluded from such comparisons, including the lack of a state earned income tax credit, and concluded that of the children of the remaining 48 states, all of Europe and Russia, achieved lower child poverty rates. It placed the California poverty rate at 25.7 percent and the New York rate at 26.3 percent. Rates in Russian were pegged at 23.2 percent, and European nations at lower levels, e.g., Germany at 8.7 percent, Sweden at 2.5 percent. State Poverty Data: For Percent of People Below Poverty Level by State, 2002 American Community Survey: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Ranking/2002/R01T040.htm For Percent of Related Children Under 18 Years Below Poverty Level by State, 2002 American Community Survey: Post new comment
|
Related Topics
Topics:
Click a link above to view all content that has been categorized under that term.
Latest Action Alerts from the Youth Policy Action Center
|